Hi all, I just noticed there is a slight difference between FASTQ files downloaded using the ‘ Faster Download and Extract Reads in FASTQ’ tool and the one published on ENA for the same accession, does anybody know why this is happening? Cheers, Rand

Welcome, @rand.zoabi Are you referring to the sequence identifiers, or the bases? Both can be a bit different, and this is why Raw reads are submitted to the SRA These are then “processed” by SRA The processed reads are what the fastq fetching tools retrieve Working with those processed reads i…

Faster Download and Extract Reads in FASTQ and ENA reads are slightly different

Resources

jennaj September 27, 2024, 9:10pm 3

Xref

Getting Data into Galaxy
Is it possible to upload data to Galaxy directly from GEO? - #2 by jennaj

Topic		Replies	Views
Faster download FASTQ from NCBI SRA_ERROR usegalaxy.org support upload , troubleshooting , transcriptomics	3	20	November 6, 2024
"Faster Download and Extract Reads in FASTA/Q" output is green but without data usegalaxy.org support ncbi , sra	1	613	September 8, 2022
Running large-scale jobs with "Faster Download and Extract Reads in FASTQ " usegalaxy.eu support ncbi , sra	1	966	April 6, 2021
fasta to fastq; fastsanger.gz to fastq; SRA to fastq ncbi , sra , fastqsanger , quality-control	3	5308	February 11, 2020
Failing to load single-cell raw fastq files into Galaxy usegalaxy.org support upload	1	611	September 20, 2021

Faster Download and Extract Reads in FASTQ and ENA reads are slightly different

Related topics